I am trying to compile an assembly code in linux ubuntu 32-bit.
But when I compile it with nasm -felf32 assembly.asm && gcc assembly.o && ./a.out
I face with Segmentation fault (core dumped)
. I understood that the problem is with printf.
I have searched a lot on the internet, there were several questions like this. But none of the answers worked for me.
global main
extern printf
section .text
main:
push ebx ; we have to save this since we use it
mov ecx, 90 ; ecx will countdown to 0
xor eax, eax ; rax will hold the current number
xor ebx, ebx ; rbx will hold the next number
inc ebx ; rbx is originally 1
print:
; We need to call printf, but we are using rax, rbx, and rcx. printf
; may destroy rax and rcx so we will save these before the call and
; restore them afterwards.
push eax ; caller-save register
push ecx ; caller-save register
mov edi, format ; set 1st parameter (format)
mov esi, eax ; set 2nd parameter (current_number)
xor eax, eax ; because printf is varargs
; Stack is already aligned because we pushed three 8 byte registers
call printf ; printf(format, current_number)
pop ecx ; restore caller-save register
pop eax ; restore caller-save register
mov edx, eax ; save the current number
mov eax, ebx ; next number is now current
add ebx, edx ; get the new next number
dec ecx ; count down
jnz print ; if not done counting, do some more
pop ebx ; restore rbx before returning
ret
format:
db "%20ld", 10, 0
*** source code is copied from Nasm tutorial site. It is for printing Fibonacci numbers.
This is too easy a question for all this fuss. You've found a 64-bit tutorial, and converting it to 32-bit is not as simple as changing
rax
toeax
. Here's how you callprintf
in 32-bit code.That's untested. With only 32-bits, I don't think you'll get the full 90 numbers. You may need to alter your
format
string. You can get a 64-bit result with 32-bit code by using two registers, but you don't have code for that...