I have a handle leak in a C# program. I'm trying to diagnose it using WinDbg using !htrace, roughly as presented in this answer, but when I run !htrace -diff in WinDbg I'm presented with stack traces that don't show the names of my C# functions (or even my .net assembly).
I created a small test program to illustrate my difficulty. This program does nothing except "leak" handles.
class Program
{
static List<Semaphore> handles = new List<Semaphore>();
static void Main(string[] args)
{
while (true)
{
Fun1();
Thread.Sleep(100);
}
}
static void Fun1()
{
handles.Add(new Semaphore(0, 10));
}
}
I compiled the assembly, and then in WinDbg I go "File" -> "Open Executable" and select my program (D:\Projects\Sandpit\bin\Debug\Sandpit.exe). I continue program execution, break it, and run "!htrace -enable", then continue for a bit longer, and then break and run "!htrace -diff". This is what I get:
0:004> !htrace -enable
Handle tracing enabled.
Handle tracing information snapshot successfully taken.
0:004> g
(1bd4.1c80): Break instruction exception - code 80000003 (first chance)
eax=7ffda000 ebx=00000000 ecx=00000000 edx=77b2f17d esi=00000000 edi=00000000
eip=77ac410c esp=0403fc20 ebp=0403fc4c iopl=0 nv up ei pl zr na pe nc
cs=001b ss=0023 ds=0023 es=0023 fs=003b gs=0000 efl=00000246
ntdll!DbgBreakPoint:
77ac410c cc int 3
0:004> !htrace -diff
Handle tracing information snapshot successfully taken.
0xd new stack traces since the previous snapshot.
Ignoring handles that were already closed...
Outstanding handles opened since the previous snapshot:
--------------------------------------
Handle = 0x00000250 - OPEN
Thread ID = 0x00001b58, Process ID = 0x00001bd4
0x77ad5704: ntdll!ZwCreateSemaphore+0x0000000c
0x75dcdcf9: KERNELBASE!CreateSemaphoreExW+0x0000005e
0x75f5e359: KERNEL32!CreateSemaphoreW+0x0000001d
*** WARNING: Unable to verify checksum for C:\Windows\assembly\NativeImages_v4.0.30319_32\System\13c079cdc1f4f4cb2f8f1b66c8642faa\System.ni.dll
0x65d7e805: System_ni+0x0020e805
0x65d47843: System_ni+0x001d7843
0x65d477ef: System_ni+0x001d77ef
0x004700c9: +0x004700c9
0x67d73dd2: clr!CallDescrWorkerInternal+0x00000034
0x67d9cf6d: clr!CallDescrWorkerWithHandler+0x0000006b
0x67d9d267: clr!MethodDescCallSite::CallTargetWorker+0x00000152
0x67eb10e0: clr!RunMain+0x000001aa
0x67eb1200: clr!Assembly::ExecuteMainMethod+0x00000124
--------------------------------------
Handle = 0x0000024c - OPEN
Thread ID = 0x00001b58, Process ID = 0x00001bd4
0x77ad5704: ntdll!ZwCreateSemaphore+0x0000000c
0x75dcdcf9: KERNELBASE!CreateSemaphoreExW+0x0000005e
0x75f5e359: KERNEL32!CreateSemaphoreW+0x0000001d
0x65d7e805: System_ni+0x0020e805
0x65d47843: System_ni+0x001d7843
0x65d477ef: System_ni+0x001d77ef
0x004700c9: +0x004700c9
0x67d73dd2: clr!CallDescrWorkerInternal+0x00000034
0x67d9cf6d: clr!CallDescrWorkerWithHandler+0x0000006b
0x67d9d267: clr!MethodDescCallSite::CallTargetWorker+0x00000152
0x67eb10e0: clr!RunMain+0x000001aa
0x67eb1200: clr!Assembly::ExecuteMainMethod+0x00000124
...
--------------------------------------
Displayed 0xd stack traces for outstanding handles opened since the previous snapshot.
As you can see, the stack trace is missing my C# function names "Main" and "Fun1". I believe "System_ni+0x..." frames may be my function frames, but I don't know. My question is, how do I get WinDbg to display function names for my C# functions in the stack trace?
Extra information: My WinDbg symbol search path is
SRVC:/symbolshttp://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols;D:\Projects\Sandpit\bin\Debug;srv*
I don't get any errors when I open the executable in WinDbg. There is a file called "Sandpit.pdb" in the output directory ("D:\Projects\Sandpit\bin\Debug"). The project is built locally so the pdb file should match the exe. I downloaded WinDbg from here. I have "Enable native code debugging" checked in the project settings in Visual Studio.
WinDbg attempts to interpret the native call stack as best it can, however to fully interpret the stack of a CLR application WinDbg needs to use an extension called SOS. This extension has a separate command
CLRStack
for viewing the stack information of CLR stacks. You will need to load the SOS extension first however using the.loadby sos clr
command (or similar, I remember getting the correct version SOS to load could be a bit of a pain)For more information see