To emphasize, the problem is real time read instead of non-blocking read. It has been asked before, e.g. subprocess.Popen.stdout - reading stdout in real-time (again). But no satisfactory solution has been proposed.
As an example, the following code tries to simulate the python shell.
import subprocess
p = subprocess.Popen(['python'], stdin=subprocess.PIPE, stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
while True:
line = input('>>> ')
p.stdin.write(line.encode())
print('>>> ', p.stdout.read().decode())
However, it would be blocked when reading from p.stdout
. After searching around, I found the following two possible soutions.
Whereas the 1st soution may work and only work on linux, the 2nd soution just turn blocking read to non-blocking read, i.e. I cannot get real time output of the subprocess. For example, if I input 'print("hello")
', I will get nothing from p.stdout
using 2nd solution.
Perhaps, someone would suggest p.communite
. Unfortunately, it is not suitable in this case, since it would close stdin as described here.
So, is there any solutions for Windows?
Edited: Even if -u
is turned on and p.stdout.read
is replaced with p.stdout.readline
, the problem still exists.
import subprocess
p = subprocess.Popen(['python', '-u'], stdin=subprocess.PIPE, stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
while True:
line = input('>>> ')
p.stdin.write(line.encode())
p.stdin.flush()
print('>>> ', p.stdout.readline().decode())
Solution: The following is the final code based on J.F. Sebastian's answer and comments.
from subprocess import Popen, PIPE, STDOUT
with Popen(
['python', '-i', '-q'],
stdin=PIPE, stdout=PIPE, stderr=STDOUT,
bufsize=0
) as process:
while True:
line = input('>>> ')
if not line:
break
process.stdin.write((line+'\n').encode())
print(process.stdout.readline().decode(), end='')
It should be noted that the program would hang when the command triggers no output.
Here's a complete working example that uses a subprocess interactively:
Here's another example: how to run
[sys.executable, '-u', 'test.py']
interactively.