Currently I am analysing the following code snippet:
fvc::surfaceSum(mag(phi))().internalField()
with
template<class Type>
tmp<GeometricField<Type, fvPatchField, volMesh> > surfaceSum
(
const tmp<GeometricField<Type, fvsPatchField, surfaceMesh> >& tssf
)
{
tmp<GeometricField<Type, fvPatchField, volMesh> > tvf = surfaceSum(tssf());
tssf.clear(); //If object pointer points to valid object:delete object and
//set pointer to NULL
return tvf;
}
and
template<class Type, template<class> class PatchField, class GeoMesh>
tmp<GeometricField<scalar, PatchField, GeoMesh> > mag
(
const GeometricField<Type, PatchField, GeoMesh>& gf
)
{
tmp<GeometricField<scalar, PatchField, GeoMesh> > tMag
(
new GeometricField<scalar, PatchField, GeoMesh>
(
IOobject
(
"mag(" + gf.name() + ')',
gf.instance(),
gf.db(),
IOobject::NO_READ,
IOobject::NO_WRITE
),
gf.mesh(),
gf.dimensions()
)
);
mag(tMag(), gf);
return tMag;
}
and
template<class T>
inline const T& Foam::tmp<T>::operator()() const
{
if (isTmp_) // bool isTmp_//Flag for whether object is a temporary or a constant object
{
if (!ptr_) //mutable T* ptr_; //- Pointer to temporary object
{
FatalErrorIn("const T& Foam::tmp<T>::operator()() const")
<< "temporary deallocated"
<< abort(FatalError);
}
return *ptr_;
}
else
{
return ref_; //const T& ref_ //- Const reference to constant object
}
}
and
template<class Type, template<class> class PatchField, class GeoMesh>
typename
Foam::GeometricField<Type, PatchField, GeoMesh>::InternalField
{
this->setUpToDate(); //Set up to date
storeOldTimes(); //Store the old-time fields.
return *this;
}
Method surfaceSum(...) in the second code snippet expects const tmp<GeometricField<Type, fvsPatchField, surfaceMesh> >&
as input parameter, but when going through the other methods the result I get is a non-const parameter tmp<GeometricField<scalar, PatchField, GeoMesh> > tMag
(see third codesnippet). Therefore, ist it possible to pass a non-const object for a const
input parameter or am I misinterpreting something here?
greetings streight
I can't find any calls to
surfaceSum
(a few typedefs would greatly improve readability), but, yes, you can pass a non-const object as a const input parameter. Theconst
on the input only says "I won't modify the object that you pass".