I have written some codes below to process multichannel images, which invovle stacking, splitting and merging them back according to the order I have assigned.
// Run Z Project
run("Z Project...", "projection=[Sum Slices]");
// Split Channels
run("Split Channels");
// Get the number of open windows
nWindows = nImages();
// Create an array to store titles
windowTitles = newArray(nWindows);
// Loop through all open windows and store titles
for (i = 0; i < nWindows; i++) {
// Select the i-th window
selectImage(i + 1); // ImageJ uses 1-based indexing
// Get the title of the active window and store it in the array
windowTitles[i] = getTitle();
// Define identifiers
identifier1 = "C1-";
identifier2 = "C2-";
identifier3 = "C3-";
identifier4 = "C4-";
identifier5 = "C5-";
// Check if the title contains any of the identifiers
if (
windowTitles[i].indexOf(identifier1) != -1 ||
windowTitles[i].indexOf(identifier2) != -1 ||
windowTitles[i].indexOf(identifier3) != -1 ||
windowTitles[i].indexOf(identifier4) != -1 ||
windowTitles[i].indexOf(identifier5) != -1
) {
// Run Merge Channels
run("Merge Channels...", "c1=" + identifier5 + " c2=" + identifier2 + " c3=" + identifier1 + " c4=0 c5=0 c6=" + identifier5 + " c7=" + identifier3);
}
}
However, error keeps showing up as it said: ')' expected in line 30 windowTitles[i].indexOf(identifier1) != -1 ||
Is there any ideas to fix this?
Thank you
From the code snippet, I don't see why you would get that error. However, the final merge command will not work because you are specifying first that "c1=C5-"... and you should not have a window with the name C5-. Also the "c4=0" will throw an error. Even if the merge command is fixed, the
ifstatement doesn't make sense. One of the windows will always match so you would generate 5 merges that are all the same (because the arguments are variables that do not change).A more simple approach: if you know that you will have 5 channels, you can just predict the names of the windows and write the merge that way.
If you want to make the code more flexible then the approach you were trying is good, but it sounds like you have a specific task that needs automating and the snippet above should do the job.