Is it possible in Haskell to apply the function arrow type constructor (->) to only its right-side type (for instance: (-> a)) to get a type constructor of kind * -> *?
Haskell apply function arrow to only result type?
306 views Asked by Edward At
1
There are 1 answers
Related Questions in HASKELL
- Slow performance on ipad erasing image
- Can Apache Ant be told to cache its XML files?
- What are the pros and cons of the picture element?
- DB candidate as CouchDB/Schema replacement
- python member str performance too slow
- Split a large query (2 days) into pieces to increase the speed in Postgres
- Use GUI displayed results of SQL query vs new queries?
- fastest way to map a large number of longs
- Bash regular expression execution hangs on long expressions
- Why is calling a function so slow in Javascript?
Related Questions in TYPES
- Slow performance on ipad erasing image
- Can Apache Ant be told to cache its XML files?
- What are the pros and cons of the picture element?
- DB candidate as CouchDB/Schema replacement
- python member str performance too slow
- Split a large query (2 days) into pieces to increase the speed in Postgres
- Use GUI displayed results of SQL query vs new queries?
- fastest way to map a large number of longs
- Bash regular expression execution hangs on long expressions
- Why is calling a function so slow in Javascript?
Related Questions in TYPE-KINDS
- Slow performance on ipad erasing image
- Can Apache Ant be told to cache its XML files?
- What are the pros and cons of the picture element?
- DB candidate as CouchDB/Schema replacement
- python member str performance too slow
- Split a large query (2 days) into pieces to increase the speed in Postgres
- Use GUI displayed results of SQL query vs new queries?
- fastest way to map a large number of longs
- Bash regular expression execution hangs on long expressions
- Why is calling a function so slow in Javascript?
Popular Questions
- How do I undo the most recent local commits in Git?
- How can I remove a specific item from an array in JavaScript?
- How do I delete a Git branch locally and remotely?
- Find all files containing a specific text (string) on Linux?
- How do I revert a Git repository to a previous commit?
- How do I create an HTML button that acts like a link?
- How do I check out a remote Git branch?
- How do I force "git pull" to overwrite local files?
- How do I list all files of a directory?
- How to check whether a string contains a substring in JavaScript?
- How do I redirect to another webpage?
- How can I iterate over rows in a Pandas DataFrame?
- How do I convert a String to an int in Java?
- Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?
- How do I check if a string contains a specific word?
Popular Tags
Trending Questions
- UIImageView Frame Doesn't Reflect Constraints
- Is it possible to use adb commands to click on a view by finding its ID?
- How to create a new web character symbol recognizable by html/javascript?
- Why isn't my CSS3 animation smooth in Google Chrome (but very smooth on other browsers)?
- Heap Gives Page Fault
- Connect ffmpeg to Visual Studio 2008
- Both Object- and ValueAnimator jumps when Duration is set above API LvL 24
- How to avoid default initialization of objects in std::vector?
- second argument of the command line arguments in a format other than char** argv or char* argv[]
- How to improve efficiency of algorithm which generates next lexicographic permutation?
- Navigating to the another actvity app getting crash in android
- How to read the particular message format in android and store in sqlite database?
- Resetting inventory status after order is cancelled
- Efficiently compute powers of X in SSE/AVX
- Insert into an external database using ajax and php : POST 500 (Internal Server Error)
No, it is currently impossible. There are certain limitations to Haskell's type system that allow it to be useful and convenient for most cases, and this is one of those limitations. Your best alternative is to use a newtype.
Newtypes are simply tags to help the compiler know how to typecheck and perform type-directed dispatch (typeclasses) properly. Presumably you wanted to flip the type arguments to provide some typeclass instance. That just means that whenever you want to make use of that typeclass's functions, you have to decorate any specific inputs with
FuncFlip
, and undecorate any specific outputs withunFuncFlip
. This is slightly more verbose than desired, but it's not actually that bad, because it forces you to explicitly identify which instance of the typeclass you want to use.You can create an instance of Newtype for this, which may or may not turn out to be convenient for you.
Further reading: Are there "type-level combinatos?"