I created the main query that returns values for a whole, with 2 secondary conditions to restrict choice to be taken in the side combo box.
Everything works with the set parameters. I wish I could turn off or turn on these conditions with side combo box, how should I proceed?
my code is in Delphi:
procedure TForm1.Button3Click(Sender: TObject);
begin
FDQuery3.Close;
FDquery3.Params[0].Value := Datetimepicker1.Date;
FDquery3.Params[1].Value := Datetimepicker2.Date;
FDQuery3.Params[2].Value := Combobox3.Items [Combobox3.Itemindex];
FDQuery3.Params[3].Value := Combobox5.Items [Combobox5.Itemindex];
FDQuery3.Open;
end;
SQL text is:
select
G.NUM_PROG,T.DATA,T.ORA,C.DESCRIZIONE,
(select DESKEY from ANAFORN where CODKEY=T.CODICE ) as Cliente,
O.NOMINATIVO, T.TERMINALE,T.INCASSO
from LG_RIGHE G
inner join LG_TESTA T on G.NUM_PROG =T.NUM_PROG
inner join OPERATORI O on T.OPERATORE = O.CODICE
inner join LG_CAUSA C on T.CAUSALE = C.CODICE
where T.DATA >= :data1
and T.DATA <= :data2
and T.INCASSO = :pagamento
and T.TERMINALE = :terminale
order by G.NUM_PROG
i want turn on/off only Params[2][ and Params[3] (name: pagamento, terminale)
1) The typical way to optionally ignore a condition is to add one more "toggle" parameter. Consider this Delphi code
Got the idea? But very long that is, is there a more concise way to write it ?
Now let's re-phrase it from Delphi to SQL WHERE clause
Whether you set that USE_xxxx parameter to zero (similar to false) then the second check would be shortcut out, ignored.
And the calling code would be something like
Some more suggestions follow:
2) using names like
ComboBox3
are bad. You would not understand what they mean, what was they intended to be for. Look at your SQL - you give names there! You do not make it likeAnd you have to give reasonable names to your Delphi objects too!
That
FDQuery3
, thatCheckbox3
thatCombobox5
- rename them all, give them some meaningful names!3) you have a nested select there as the
Cliente
column. Unless very special circumstances that is slow and inefficient - change it toJOIN
too (maybe toLEFT JOIN
, if sometimes there is no matching value)4) Depending on the circumstances you may just want to alter the SQL text. If the parameter would be ignored - then simply remove it!
This option is not universal, it has good and bad sides though. But in your case it would rather do good or nothing - because you have human to re-open the query and human would not be able to do it more often than once per second.
Good: then the server gets your SQL text it prepares the QUERY PLAN. The internal program of how to fetch your data. And it does not know yet what your parameters would be, so it prepares the PLAN to always check those parameters. Even if you later would ignore them. Sometimes it might make server choose slow PLAN where it could choose faster one if it knew the parameter would be not used. Sometimes it would make no difference. Game of luck.
Bad: if you keep the SQL text the same, then you can
PREPARE
the query once and the server would not build differentPLAN
when you re-open the query with different parameters. But if you do change the SQL text, then server would have to parse that new query and PREPARE the PLAN again before it would give you data. Sometimes it would take considerable time when you open-close queries, say, 1000 times per second. OF course, when you use a human to set those checkboxes, comboboxes and then press buttons, he would not do it that frequently, so in this case that risk is moot.So in your case you might do something like this instead of introducing those toggle-parameters:
In this option you do not introduce extra toggle-parameters, but instead you only add value-parameters when user checked to use them. If user unchecked them - then you do not include them into your SQL text and consequently you do not assign them any values (they would not be found anyway).
5) you may use BETWEEN - it may be easier to read.