TechQA.

Question

Clear any transactions

score 162 · Answer 1 · 2016-12-14 02:37:21

1

Answer

162

Views

Clear any transactions

162 views Asked by Jonathan Wood At 14 December 2016 at 02:37

score 137 · Answer 2 · 2016-12-31 00:07:06

Preventing deconstruction of anonymous variable defined in macro until end of scope

137 views Asked by mdeforge At 31 December 2016 at 00:07

score 2270 · Answer 3 · 2017-01-02 02:44:16

How to prevent a temporary from going out of scope?

2.2k views Asked by Zebrafish At 02 January 2017 at 02:44

score 470 · Answer 4 · 2014-11-18 15:33:58

Poco AsyncChannel does not exit on forked process exit

470 views Asked by ashish behl At 18 November 2014 at 15:33

score 132 · Answer 5 · 2014-11-22 00:55:37

What makes a language unwilling/incapable to incorporate RAII?

132 views Asked by 2c2c At 22 November 2014 at 00:55

score 253 · Answer 6 · 2014-11-23 02:16:24

RAII objects in a singleton container?

253 views Asked by GaimeGuy At 23 November 2014 at 02:16

score 421 · Answer 7 · 2013-12-09 16:14:35

RAII with shared_ptr

421 views Asked by Smii At 09 December 2013 at 16:14

score 3565 · Answer 8 · 2017-08-29 13:09:08

How does C++ automatically call destructor?

3.5k views Asked by havij At 29 August 2017 at 13:09

score 116 · Answer 9 · 2017-09-04 05:02:48

Should I use smart pointers in this situation?

116 views Asked by OneRaynyDay At 04 September 2017 at 05:02

score 136 · Answer 10 · 2017-09-14 20:47:30

Deallocate a stack object before execution gets out of the scope of the stack object?

136 views Asked by Tim At 14 September 2017 at 20:47

TechQA.

List Question

Clear any transactions

Preventing deconstruction of anonymous variable defined in macro until end of scope

How to prevent a temporary from going out of scope?

Poco AsyncChannel does not exit on forked process exit

What makes a language unwilling/incapable to incorporate RAII?

RAII objects in a singleton container?

RAII with shared_ptr

How does C++ automatically call destructor?

Should I use smart pointers in this situation?

Deallocate a stack object before execution gets out of the scope of the stack object?

Popular Questions

Popular Tags

Trending Questions