TechQA.

Question

Coq/Ltac: is it possible to design a tactic that says the goal is proved when a decision procedure proves it, without the proof term?

score 50 · Answer 1 · 2024-01-25T18:30:43.390000

0

Answer

50

Views

Coq/Ltac: is it possible to design a tactic that says the goal is proved when a decision procedure proves it, without the proof term?

50 views Asked by Henrique Guerra At 25 January 2024 at 18:30

score 58 · Answer 2 · 2023-06-04T02:48:41.403000

Clear hypotheses after recursive Ltac

58 views Asked by epelaez At 04 June 2023 at 02:48

score 81 · Answer 3 · 2023-05-07T10:10:27.037000

Ltac tactic that accepts an arbitrary number of quantifiers

81 views Asked by Jay Lee At 07 May 2023 at 10:10

score 67 · Answer 4 · 2023-04-24T16:58:44.023000

`fresh` name: use match result if variable, do something else if it's a constant

67 views Asked by nobody At 24 April 2023 at 16:58

score 125 · Answer 5 · 2023-03-15T15:20:48.060000

How to create a custom Ltac to recursively destruct conjunctions?

125 views Asked by radrow At 15 March 2023 at 15:20

score 109 · Answer 6 · 2023-02-10T10:07:05.190000

Why does Ltac not match the clause?

109 views Asked by Bruno At 10 February 2023 at 10:07

score 166 · Answer 7 · 2022-02-07T19:34:05.313000

Coq: How are the equality tacticts symmetry and transitivity defined?

166 views Asked by IsAdisplayName At 07 February 2022 at 19:34

score 82 · Answer 8 · 2021-09-08T10:17:14.463000

Adding "in" part to tactic to specify where to apply it

82 views Asked by Kristian At 08 September 2021 at 10:17

score 468 · Answer 9 · 2021-08-18T19:21:48.050000

Destruct hypothesis: general case

468 views Asked by Vadim Pushtaev At 18 August 2021 at 19:21

score 696 · Answer 10 · 2021-07-14T12:16:19.453000

Coq match on Hypothesis passed to Ltac tactic

696 views Asked by Benjamin Bray At 14 July 2021 at 12:16

score 85 · Answer 11 · 2021-06-25T16:19:59.043000

apply ltac to subexpression of a goal

85 views Asked by push33n At 25 June 2021 at 16:19

score 170 · Answer 12 · 2020-09-14T01:02:07.583000

Coq: Ltac for transitivity of implication (a.k.a. hypothetical syllogism)

170 views Asked by Landon D. C. Elkind At 14 September 2020 at 01:02

score 178 · Answer 13 · 2020-02-09T00:47:10.723000

Is it possible to turn a context pattern into a Gallina function?

178 views Asked by dunnl At 09 February 2020 at 00:47

score 318 · Answer 14 · 2019-12-28T13:57:08.593000

Does Isabelle/HOL have its tactic language?

318 views Asked by TomR At 28 December 2019 at 13:57

score 117 · Answer 15 · 2019-06-27T13:09:19.143000

Is it possible to bind necessarily different terms in Ltac-match?

117 views Asked by frabala At 27 June 2019 at 13:09

score 335 · Answer 16 · 2019-04-21T21:05:42.773000

apply rewrite tactic to sub-expression

335 views Asked by yewang At 21 April 2019 at 21:05

score 451 · Answer 17 · 2018-11-07T21:43:46.617000

Coq tactic for applying a concrete hypothesis to an existential goal

451 views Asked by Jeremy Salwen At 07 November 2018 at 21:43

score 1413 · Answer 18 · 2018-11-04T08:05:54.193000

Coq forward reasoning: apply with multiple hypotheses

1.4k views Asked by Jeremy Salwen At 04 November 2018 at 08:05

score 462 · Answer 19 · 2018-10-29T18:13:29.447000

Remove All Double Negations in Coq

462 views Asked by mlg556 At 29 October 2018 at 18:13

score 488 · Answer 20 · 2018-10-25T20:08:08.537000

Is "printf-debugging" possible in Ltac?

488 views Asked by Carl Patenaude Poulin At 25 October 2018 at 20:08

TechQA.

List Question

Coq/Ltac: is it possible to design a tactic that says the goal is proved when a decision procedure proves it, without the proof term?

Clear hypotheses after recursive Ltac

Ltac tactic that accepts an arbitrary number of quantifiers

`fresh` name: use match result if variable, do something else if it's a constant

How to create a custom Ltac to recursively destruct conjunctions?

Why does Ltac not match the clause?

Coq: How are the equality tacticts symmetry and transitivity defined?

Adding "in" part to tactic to specify where to apply it

Destruct hypothesis: general case

Coq match on Hypothesis passed to Ltac tactic

apply ltac to subexpression of a goal

Coq: Ltac for transitivity of implication (a.k.a. hypothetical syllogism)

Is it possible to turn a context pattern into a Gallina function?

Does Isabelle/HOL have its tactic language?

Is it possible to bind necessarily different terms in Ltac-match?

apply rewrite tactic to sub-expression

Coq tactic for applying a concrete hypothesis to an existential goal

Coq forward reasoning: apply with multiple hypotheses

Remove All Double Negations in Coq

Is "printf-debugging" possible in Ltac?

Popular Questions

Trending Questions