I try to write a very simple code to test @Transactional, but it won't rollback when I use Propagation.REQUIRED. Here is the code.
@Component
public class A {
private JdbcTemplate jdbcTemplate;
@Resource(name="dataSource")
public void setDataSource(DataSource dataSource) {
this.jdbcTemplate = new JdbcTemplate(dataSource);
}
@Transactional(propagation=Propagation.REQUIRED)
public void add(Person person) throws Exception {
try {
String sql = "insert into person (id, name) values(?,?)";
jdbcTemplate.update(sql, new Object[{person.getId(),person.getName()});
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException();
}
@Transactional(propagation=Propagation.REQUIRED)
public void delete(String id) throws Exception {
throw new RuntimeException();
***throw a RuntimeException on purpose***
}
}
public class cases {
@Transactional
public static void testPro() throws Exception {
try {
AbstractApplicationContext aac = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("beans.xml");
A a = (A) aac.getBean("a");
a.add(***a random person***);
a.delete("99");
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException();
}
}
@Test
public void test() throws Exception {
testPro();
}
}
When I test add() method alone by creating a new RuntimeException(), it will rollback. This is what I expected. However, when I run the test() method, the add() method won't rollback when delete() throws a new RuntimeException. It means the add() and delete() are not in a same transaction, but what I want is all the things to be rollback. Please help.
@TransactionalontestPro()has no effect for 3 separate reasons:testPro()is static.test()in same class.casesnot created by Spring.That means that
add()anddelete()are running in two separate transactions.To prove it, try changing the propagation on
delete()toMANDATORY. It will now throw exception saying that transaction is not in progress (or something to that effect).