I have a buffer pool implementation which basically provides pre-allocated ByteBuffer objects via allocate()
/release()
API. In order to detect the cases when caller forgot to call release and the ByteBuffer ref is leaked, I am using Guava's FinalizableReferenceQueue
in conjunction with FinalizablePhantomReference. finalizeReferent()
.
Additionally, I need to selectively destroy the buffer pool and replace it with a newer one with a different configuration. For that, I was setting previous SampleBufferPool
reference to null
and let garbage collector do its job. However, I noticed that the ByteBuffer were not getting collected/finalizeReferent is not being called. (I verified that the full GC pause are not collecting any memory via adding -XX:+PrintGCDetails -verbose:gc
JVM flags)
package foo;
import com.google.common.base.FinalizablePhantomReference;
import com.google.common.base.FinalizableReferenceQueue;
import com.google.common.collect.Sets;
import java.lang.ref.Reference;
import java.nio.ByteBuffer;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedDeque;
import java.util.stream.IntStream;
public class App {
public static class SampleBufferPool {
// Phantom reference queue for detecting memory leaks
// See. https://guava.dev/releases/19.0/api/docs/com/google/common/base/FinalizableReferenceQueue.html
private static final FinalizableReferenceQueue FRQ = new FinalizableReferenceQueue();
// This ensures that the FinalizablePhantomReference itself is not garbage-collected.
public static final Set<Reference<?>> REFERENCES = Sets.newConcurrentHashSet();
private final ConcurrentLinkedDeque<ByteBuffer> _bufferCache = new ConcurrentLinkedDeque<>();
private final int _chunkSize;
private final int _numChunks;
public SampleBufferPool(int chunkSize, int numChunks) {
_chunkSize = chunkSize;
_numChunks = numChunks;
IntStream.range(0, _numChunks).forEach(i -> populateSingleChunk());
}
public ByteBuffer allocate() {
return _bufferCache.pollLast();
}
public void release(ByteBuffer chunk) {
_bufferCache.offerLast(chunk);
}
private void populateSingleChunk() {
ByteBuffer chunk = ByteBuffer.allocate(_chunkSize);
_bufferCache.offerLast(chunk);
Reference<?> reference = new FinalizablePhantomReference<>(chunk, FRQ) {
@Override
public void finalizeReferent() {
REFERENCES.remove(this);
System.out.println("LEAK DETECTED. ByteBuf[" + "] from RecyclingMemoryPool");
}
};
REFERENCES.add(reference);
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
SampleBufferPool sampleBufferPool = new SampleBufferPool(20000000, 400);
sampleBufferPool = null;
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
System.gc();
}
}
}
You are creating a subclass of
FinalizablePhantomReference
as anonymous subclass inside a non-static context:Prior to JDK 18, anonymous inner classes always keep a reference to their surrounding instance, whether they are using it or not. As described by bug report JDK-8271717, this changes with JDK 18 when compiling the source code with
javac
. Since this still is a compiler specific behavior and further, it is too easy to use a member of the surrounding class by accident, which would force keeping a reference to the instance, you should use astatic
context. E.g.Of course, the phantom reference object must not have strong references to the referent as well. If you need properties of the referent, you must extract them beforehand, e.g.