I suppose when a universal reference parameter is matched with an rvalue reference argument, an rvalue reference argument is returned. However, my testing shows that the rvalue reference is turned into a lvalue reference by the universal reference function template. Why is it so?
#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>
using namespace std;
template <typename T>
T f1(T&&t) { //<-----this is a universal reference
cout << "is_lvalue reference:" << is_lvalue_reference<T>::value << endl;
cout << "is_rvalue reference:" << is_rvalue_reference<T>::value << endl;
cout << "is_reference:" << is_reference<T>::value << endl;
return t;
}
void f2(int&& t) {
cout << "f2 is_lvalue reference:" << is_lvalue_reference<decltype(t)>::value << endl;
cout << "f2 is_rvalue reference:" << is_rvalue_reference<decltype(t)>::value << endl;
cout << "f2 is_reference:" << is_reference<decltype(t)>::value << endl;
f1(t);
}
int main()
{
f2(5);
return 0;
}
In both GCC and VC++2010, this is the result:
f2 is_lvalue reference:0
f2 is_rvalue reference:1
f2 is_reference:1
is_lvalue reference:1
is_rvalue reference:0
is_reference:1
In other words, the parameter t
in f2
was an rvalue reference, but when passed to f1
, the parameter became a lvalue reference. Shouldn't it retain the rvalue-ness in f1
?
The reason is that named rvalue references are treated as lvalues.
You should use std::move inside f2 when passing t to f1 to retain rvalueness:
Here you can find a good explanation.