I’m currently working on an implementation that facilitates the flow of data, from clinical record(s) into a personal health record.
We are planning to use the FHIR ClinicalImpression resource for routine planned heath reviews and it seems to be a good match. These reviews are part of a standard care plan, have specific names/types to differentiate them and have a form with a set questions, tests, findings and follow up for the health professional to fill out with the patient. Looking at the ClinicalImpression resource I see no property for (a) location where the assessment took place and (b) the name/type of the assessment.
This seems an oversight. Should these be implemented using extensions?
We see investigations[0]/code as inappropriate, because the name / type of the assessment relates to all of the information in the clinical impression
Any comments, suggestions or feedback would be most welcome.
Thanks in advance,
Bob.
ClinicalImpression is still draft, so it may be missing important pieces of information. Feel free to submit a change request proposing the addition of these elements. In the meantime, extensions would have to be your solution. (Location could also be captured via Provenance.)