My company is RHEL customer, and I need base container images for:
- Portable CI/CD build environments
- Running services with minimal dependencies (Go, Java, Python)
Looking at these 2 docker files, they are identical. Is there any difference in support model, or maintenance?
By the docs of RHEL
BOTH
ATOMIC
UBI-MINIMAL
Size: 79.1MB - 83MB; composed of 91 packages. - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703082
Designed for applications that contain their own dependencies (Python, Node.js, .NET, etc.) - https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/introducing-red-hat-universal-base-image
This image is maintained by Red Hat and updated regularly. - https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/ubi7/ubi-minimal/5c3594f7dd19c775cddfa777?gti-tabs=unauthenticated&container-tabs=dockerfile
I personally would choose UBI-Minimal, but, think you should also take a look at the UBI FAQ to know the details, pros and cons of each image depending on your business - https://developers.redhat.com/articles/ubi-faq#ubi_details