I want to write some utility functions that operate on Synchronized<T>
objects. I could write 2 versions one for const and one for non-const but that seems silly. Alternatively I could write 1 version just for const. I'm not sure if there's any downside to this because it seems like you can still modify the "locked" object via Synchronized::wlock
method.
folly::Synchronized allows calling wlock
(ie lock exclusively in write mode) on both a const Synchronized
and non-const Synchronized
object -- link.
However they return different output types. Is there any difference between LockedPtr
and ConstWLockedPtr
? In particular I'm interested in differences in functionality & in particular any lack of functionality with ConstWLockedPtr
.
wlock
does not compile when used on aconst folly::Synchronized<T>&
. So you must a mutable reference to callwlock
. Forrlock
you can use mutable or const; it'll just implicitly convert toconst
.