I have a question regarding the type signatures in Haskell, which I find sometimes a bit difficult to unterstand. For example the type signature of zipWith
is:
zipWith :: (a -> b -> c) -> [a] -> [b] -> [c]
What I see here is that zipWith
expects a function (with parameters of type a
and b
), a list with a
s, a list with b
s and it gives us a list of c
s. But I do not unterstand why I can use zipWith
with (+)
for example, which has the signature:
(+) :: a -> a -> a
From my point of view the signature of (+)
doesn't match with the signature of (a -> b -> c)
. (+)
only expects parameters of type a
, while (a -> b -> c)
expects parameters of different types: a
and b
. Can anyone give me a hint what is my fault?
(a -> b -> c)
means any function that takes a typea
and a typeb
and returns a typec
. There is nothing to stop you from using a function that has the signature(a -> a -> a)
, it just happens that in this case the types are all the same.Assume you had a method with this signature:
you couldn't use a method with a signature of
(a -> b -> c)
in this case as the expected method signature is more restrictive.