I have a problem with TYPO3 which I encountered several times now.
If i fetch an object with the TYPO3 CONTENT Object i have the possibility to render the fields with the renderObj... So far so good...
But if i try to fetch an object which i fetched already before i dont get any response..
Following setup:
temp.current = COA
temp.current {
10 = CONTENT
10 {
table = pages
select {
pidInList = 22
max = 1
}
renderObj = COA
renderObj {
10 = CONTENT
10 {
table = tt_content
select {
pidInList.field = uid
where = colPos = 9
max = 1
languageField = sys_language_uid
}
renderObj = COA
renderObj {
5 = TEXT
5 {
value = here
typolink {
parameter.field = pid
title {
cObject = RECORDS
cObject {
tables = pages
source.field = pid
conf.pages = TEXT
conf.pages.field = title
}
}
}
}
20 = IMAGE
20 {
required = 1
file{
import = uploads/pics/
import.field = image
import.data = levelmedia: -1, slide
import.listNum = 0
width = 300c
height = 300c
}
titleText.field = titleText // altText
altText.field = altText // titleText
imageLinkWrap = 1
imageLinkWrap {
enable = 1
typolink {
parameter.data = field:pid
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
This is my current setup which i need to get a current project... Whatever..
The important part is:
5 = TEXT
5 {
value = here
typolink {
parameter.field = pid
title {
cObject = RECORDS
cObject {
tables = pages
source.field = pid
conf.pages = TEXT
conf.pages.field = title
}
}
}
}
I've already debugged the result of source... The value is 92, which is the correct uid from the page from where I need the title field...
Also I know that the code should be okay, because I use this snippet on many pages.
I think the problem is, that I try to fetch a content which i already fetched before..
Right here:
temp.current = COA
temp.current {
10 = CONTENT
10 {
table = pages
select {
pidInList = 22
max = 1
}
}
}
Many thanks!
// EDIT
I found a very good solution for my problem..
5 = TEXT
5 {
value = hier
typolink {
parameter.field = pid
title.cObject = TEXT
title.cObject {
data.dataWrap = DB:pages:{field:pid}:title
}
}
}
According to http://forge.typo3.org/issues/20541 you are right and this has not been viewed as a bug but a feature ("recursion prevention").