I'm working with raster package and I try to switch to terra but for some reasons that I don't understand, terra cannot reproduce the same operation of raster when working in parallel with packages such snowfall and future.apply. Here is a reproducible example.
library(terra)
r <- rast()
r[] <- 1:ncell(r)
m <- rast()
m[] <- c(rep(1,ncell(m)/5),rep(2,ncell(m)/5),rep(3,ncell(m)/5),rep(4,ncell(m)/5),rep(5,ncell(m)/5))
ms <- separate(m,other=NA)
plot(ms)
mymask <- function(ind){
tipo <- tipo_tav[ind]
mask <- ms[[ind]]
masked <-
terra::mask(
r,
mask
)
richard <- function(x){
k <-0.2
v <-0.3
a <-200
y0 <-2
y <- k/v*x*(1-((x/a)^v))+y0
return(y)
}
pred <- richard(masked)
pred <- clamp(pred,lower=0)
return(pred)
}
#the sequential usage works fine, faster than the `raster` counterpart
system.time(x <- mymask(1))#0.03
#when I try to run my function in parallel I receive an error
plan(multisession,workers=5)
system.time(pred_list <- future_lapply(1:5, FUN = mymask))
Error in .External(list(name = "CppMethod__invoke_notvoid", address = <pointer: (nil)>, : NULL value as symbol address.
the exactly same code works well if I change rast with raster and terra::mask with raster::mask. See below:
library(raster)
r <- raster(r)
ms <- stack(ms)
mymask <- function(ind){
tipo <- tipo_tav[ind]
mask <- ms[[ind]]
masked <-
raster::mask(
r,
mask
)
richard <- function(x){
k <-0.2
v <-0.3
a <-200
y0 <-2
y <- k/v*x*(1-((x/a)^v))+y0
return(y)
}
pred <- richard(masked)
pred <- clamp(pred,lower=0)
return(pred)
}
#this works fine
system.time(x <- mymask(1))#0.06
#this works too
plan(multisession,workers=5)
system.time(pred_list <- future_lapply(1:5, FUN = mymask))#15.48
The same behavior if I use snowfall instead of future
library(snowfall)
sfInit(parallel = TRUE, cpus =5)
sfLibrary(terra)
sfExportAll()
system.time(pred_list <- sfLapply(1:5, fun = mymask))
sfStop()
this return the same error of future_lapply
Why is this happening? I've never seen such an error. I was hoping to take advantage of the higher speed of terra but so I'm stuck.
A
SpatRastercannot be serialized, you cannot send it to parallel compute nodes. Have a look here for more discussion.Instead you can (a) send and receive filenames; (b) parallelize your custom function that you supply to
apporlapp; (c) use thecores=nargument (where available, e.g.appandpredict); (d) use a mechanism likewrap; (e) send a filename and a vector to make a SpatExtent to process and create a virtual raster from the output tiles (see ?vrt).For example, you could do use a function like this (Option "a")
I use
appbecause it is much more efficient for large rasters --- as it could avoid writing temp files for each of the 10 arithmetic operations with a SpatRaster. Given that you want to parallelize this relatively simple function, I assume the files are very large.Or option "c":
In neither case I included the masking. You could include it in option "a" but
maskis disk I/O intensive, not computationally intensive, so it might be as efficient to do it in one step rather than in parallel.With
wrapyou could do something like thisWhere
fwould be run in parallel. That only works for small rasters, but you could parallelize over tiles, and you can create tiles withterra::makeTiles.More internal parallelization options will be coming, but don't hold your breath.