I would like to set the NODE_ENV variable at the beginning of a Grunt task, to development
or production
, but it looks it's not as simple as I thought.
The reason, why I would like this is that I use grunt-webpack, which expects NODE_ENV to be set correctly to "development" or "production". But I also would like to initialize my tasks exclusively from grunt, if possible.
I created the following test Gruntfile, using the grunt-shell and cross-env modules:
function log(err, stdout, stderr, cb, e) {
if (err) {
cb(err);
return;
}
console.log(process.env.NODE_ENV);
console.log(stdout);
cb();
}
module.exports = function(grunt) {
grunt.initConfig({
shell: {
dev: {
command : 'cross-env NODE_ENV="development"',
options: {
callback: log
}
},
dist: {
command : 'cross-env NODE_ENV="production"',
options: {
callback: log
}
}
}
});
grunt.loadNpmTasks('grunt-shell');
};
Line 6 of log() should echo the actual value of process.env.NODE_ENV, but it constantly says undefined
, even if I check it manually in the node console.
If I set it manually from the terminal, like set NODE_ENV=production
(set
is for Windows), everywhere echoes the value production
, as I would like it to.
Your test won't work because grunt-shell runs a child_process and your callback runs after it ends and under the main process.
Same thing would happen with cross-env.
If you want to pass an environment variable to
grunt-shell
, you should use the options configuration according to the documentation.For example:
This will still print
undefined
forprocess.env.NODE_ENV
, but the value ofNODE_ENV
will be available in thestdout
because of theecho
.On a side note, it sounds like you're trying to run a process (
grunt-shell
), which runs a process (cross-env
), which runs a process (webpack
orgrunt-webpack
).Why not just use the
cross-env
example usage? It looks pretty close to what you need.Or you can just define the variable in the task config itself and lose all of these wrappers.