I'm just trying to implement a simple Observer pattern in Python and am running into an issue. This is my code:
class Observable:
def __init__(self):
self.__observers = []
def register_observer(self, observer):
self.__observers.append(observer)
def notify_observers(self, data):
for observer in self.__observers:
observer.notify(self, data)
class Observer:
def __init__(self, observable):
observable.register_observer(self)
self.data_present = False
self.data = ''
def notify(self, observable, data):
self.data_present = True
self.data = data
def wait(self):
while True:
if not self.data_present:
time.sleep(5)
else:
break
return self.data
In here, I would like to eliminate the busy waiting in Observer.wait() (the line time.sleep(5). How can I perhaps signal to this function?
You don't need to have the
wait
function at all -- just do what you need to innotify
(process the data, log the data, mutilate/spindle/fold the data, whatever).If you are using threading, check out the Queue.Queue class: it allows for multiple threads to synchronize on data availability without busy-waiting -- just have the
notify
method push data into aQueue
, andwait
can wait on it. Note that there is probably a more elegant solution using some of the other features found in the Threading module.As a side note, you also don't need the double-underscore in
self.__observers
-- justself.observers
is fine.