With the excellent broccoli-stew I can take a look at the exported application tree:
/* global require, module */
var EmberApp = require('ember-cli/lib/broccoli/ember-app');
var log = require('broccoli-stew').log;
var debug = require('broccoli-stew').debug;
var app = new EmberApp();
// Use `app.import` to add additional libraries to the generated
// output files.
//
// If you need to use different assets in different
// environments, specify an object as the first parameter. That
// object's keys should be the environment name and the values
// should be the asset to use in that environment.
//
// If the library that you are including contains AMD or ES6
// modules that you would like to import into your application
// please specify an object with the list of modules as keys
// along with the exports of each module as its value.
app.import('bower_components/ember-i18n/lib/i18n.js');
app.import('bower_components/raphael/raphael.js');
var finalTree = log(app.toTree());
module.exports = finalTree;
With this I get a very clean tree-like output of my application:
[ 'assets/app.js',
'assets/app.map',
'assets/app.scss',
...
'assets/vendor.css',
'assets/vendor.js',
'assets/vendor.map',
'crossdomain.xml',
'index.html',
'robots.txt',
'testem.js',
'tests/index.html' ]
I see that in that tree we have, among other files, a vendor.js
and an app.js
modules (as expected), but I do not know what packages are put into each of them.
I have the feelling I am missing one in my frontend (in this case, raphael.js
), so I would like to verify that ember-cli
(via EmberApp
) has indeed done what I asked for (namely, include the raphael.js
, probably in vendor.js
)
Taking a direct look at app.js
or vendor.js
is not feasible (too big / don't know what to look for). I want a simple tree-like display of the files that have been included by EmberApp
into vendor.js
/ app.js
, in the same (similar) format that broccoli-stew
is providing.
Is this possible? How?
To quote http://www.ember-cli.com/asset-compilation/#configuring-output-paths:
So although that is not a nice tree view, you should be fine :-)