I have the following two intercept model in nlme:
com_rel_3 <- lme (fixed = relsat ~ -1 +
Mann + Frau +
Mann:M_comfort_cw + Mann:F_comfort_cw +
Frau:F_comfort_cw + Frau:M_comfort_cw +
Mann:M_comfort_cb + Mann:F_comfort_cb +
Frau:F_comfort_cb + Frau:M_comfort_cb +
Mann:M_intergroup + Mann:F_intergroup +
Frau:F_intergroup + Frau:M_intergroup +
day_cw +
isWeekend,
random = ~ -1 +
Mann + Frau +
Mann:M_comfort_cw + Mann:F_comfort_cw +
Frau:F_comfort_cw + Frau:M_comfort_cw +
day_cw +
isWeekend
| coupleID,
method = "ML",
weights=varIdent(form = ~1 | gender),
corr=corSymm(form = ~1 | coupleID/day),
data=relsat_doub,
na.action = na.exclude,
control = lmeControl(maxIter=500, opt = "optim"))
The model runs without any errors. Additionally if I use check_singularity() from the easystats package it says the model does not have a singular fit.
However, when I try using intervals() on the model, I get an error message saying that the covariance matrix is not positive-definate.
How come nlme and easystats doesn't pick up on the issue but intervals() is? Is this a bug or are different thresholds to blame? If I really drastically reduce the random effects structure, intervals() beginns to work for my models.
Bottom line: Can I report and interpret the model (I can also bootstrap the CIs) or should I reduce the structure until intervals() works?
Thanks!