I'm currently using TortoiseSVN to do a merge of two branches and I've found that its not smart enough to handle a specific merging senario.
In one branch I have a method as follows:
MyMethod(parameter1, parameter2, parameter3)
In the other branch I have the same method as follows:
MyMethod(parameter1, parameter2, parameter4)
TortoiseMerge notices that there is a conflict but only gives me the option of using one method signature or the other. However, what I really want is to merge it into a single method with all four parameters as follows:
MyMethod(parameter1, parameter2, parameter3, parameter4)
The only way I can get around this conflict at the moment is to resolve the line so that both methods are present and then manually go to the file and correct it after the conflict has been resolved.
Is this just the way things are or is there a smarter merge tool out there somewhere that would be able to handle this scenario?
I don't get it? Your project won't compile, or worse, won't run correctly after the merge because the method signature you want is not in either branch. Isn't this more dangerous than a conflict? Perhaps I've missed something obvious.
IMHO TortoiseSVN (or rather the SVN client) is doing the right thing in reporting a conflict, it needs human intervention.