Detail:
- Maven - 3.3.1 with jaxws-maven-plugin version 2.3 and goal wsimport on a wsdlUrl that I can't paste here.
- Java 1.7
Example maven pom content:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jvnet.jax-ws-commons</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxws-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.3</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>wsdla-exec-1</id>
<goals>
<goal>wsimport</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<packageName>com.yourcompany.package</packageName>
<target>2.1</target>
<verbose>true</verbose>
<!-- Fix naming resolution due to ChangeOrderResponse duplicate stanza -->
<args>
<arg>-B-XautoNameResolution</arg>
</args>
<wsdlDirectory>src/main/resources</wsdlDirectory>
<wsdlFiles>
<wsdlFiles>service1.wsdl</wsdlFiles>
</wsdlFiles>
<wsdlLocation>/*</wsdlLocation>
<sourceDestDir>src/main/java</sourceDestDir>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>wsdla-exec-2</id>
<goals>
<goal>wsimport</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<packageName>com.yourcompany.package</packageName>
<target>2.1</target>
<verbose>true</verbose>
<!-- Fix naming resolution due to ChangeOrderResponse duplicate stanza -->
<args>
<arg>-B-XautoNameResolution</arg>
</args>
<wsdlDirectory>src/main/resources</wsdlDirectory>
<wsdlFiles>
<wsdlFile>service2.wsdl</wsdlFile>
</wsdlFiles>
<wsdlLocation>/*</wsdlLocation>
<sourceDestDir>src/main/java</sourceDestDir>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
Description:
I have been generating client code from wsdl's for quite some time now within Mule and it has always been fairly straight forward and productive but now I've hit a snag for which I might get a pointer in the right direction here.
Basically, in the generated code from the wsdl there is a nested class of the same name as the container class and this is producing the colour red in my projects where I'm using this wsdl.
What I know:
I can change the code manually and viola, or better yet I can change the wsimport to use a static file (copied from the url - incl all the xsd's) and change those files. However both seem wrong!
Is there a way I can manipulate the process of code generation or should I ask the vendor to make changes? What are your thoughts?
Many thanks, truly appreciate any input.
The answer lied in the fact that the vendor actually intended consumers to use xmlbeans for bindings and not jaxb as per the current jax-ws standard. So in order to create client code from the wsdl I was able to do either one of the following.
On windows (if you have the tool):
With Maven plugin, under your "plugins" tag (be sure to sort out the dependancies you'll need as well - not given here):
This should give you all the java artefacts you need to get on with your service consumption. Hope this helps someone.