I have a matrix class and I would like to be able to:
1) Add 2 matrices, C = A + B;
2) Add a matrix and a scalar, C = a + B;
or C = A + b;
I get an warning/error (depending on compiler flags) saying that the function calls are ambiguous:
g++ test.cpp -std=c++11
test.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
test.cpp:111:16: error: ambiguous overload for ‘operator+’ (operand types are ‘matrix<double>’ and ‘matrix<int>’)
auto C = A + B;
^
test.cpp:111:16: note: candidates are:
test.cpp:56:55: note: matrix<decltype ((declval<T>() + declval<U>()))> matrix<T>::operator+(const matrix<U>&) const [with U = int; T = double; decltype ((declval<T>() + declval<U>())) = double]
matrix<decltype(std::declval<T>()+std::declval<U>())> matrix<T>::operator+(const matrix<U> &B) const
^
test.cpp:76:57: note: matrix<decltype ((declval<V>() + declval<U>()))> operator+(const U&, const matrix<V>&) [with V = int; U = matrix<double>; decltype ((declval<V>() + declval<U>())) = matrix<double>]
matrix<decltype(std::declval<V>() + std::declval<U>())> operator+(const U &a, const matrix<V> &B)
^
test.cpp:90:57: note: matrix<decltype ((declval<V>() + declval<U>()))> operator+(const matrix<U>&, const V&) [with V = matrix<int>; U = double; decltype ((declval<V>() + declval<U>())) = matrix<double>]
matrix<decltype(std::declval<V>() + std::declval<U>())> operator+(const matrix<U> &A, const V &b)
The following is a MWE:
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <array>
template<class T>
class matrix
{
public:
matrix();
matrix(const size_t &d1, const size_t &d2);
T& operator()(const size_t &i, const size_t &j);
T operator()(const size_t &i, const size_t &j) const;
template<class U>
matrix<decltype(std::declval<T>()+std::declval<U>())> operator+(const matrix<U> &B) const;
size_t size(const size_t &n) const;
private:
std::vector<T> mData;
std::array<size_t,2> mSize;
};
template<class T>
matrix<T>::matrix() : mData()
{
for(size_t ii = 0; ii < 2; ii++)
{
mSize[ii] = 0;
}
}
template<class T>
matrix<T>::matrix(const size_t & d1, const size_t & d2) : mData()
{
mSize[0] = d1;
mSize[1] = d2;
mData.resize(d1*d2);
}
template<class T>
T& matrix<T>::operator()(const size_t &i, const size_t &j)
{
return mData[j*mSize[0] + i];
}
template<class T>
T matrix<T>::operator()(const size_t &i, const size_t &j) const
{
return mData[j*mSize[0] + i];
}
template<class T>
template<class U>
matrix<decltype(std::declval<T>()+std::declval<U>())> matrix<T>::operator+(const matrix<U> &B) const
{
matrix<decltype(std::declval<T>()+std::declval<U>())> C(mSize[0],mSize[1]);
for(size_t ii = 0; ii < mSize[0]; ii++)
{
for(size_t jj = 0; jj < mSize[1]; jj++)
{
C(ii,jj) = this->mData[jj*mSize[0] + ii] + B(ii,jj);
}
}
return C;
}
template<class T>
size_t matrix<T>::size(const size_t &n) const
{
return mSize[n-1];
}
template<class V, class U>
matrix<decltype(std::declval<V>() + std::declval<U>())> operator+(const U &a, const matrix<V> &B)
{
matrix<decltype(std::declval<V>() + std::declval<U>())> C(B.size(1),B.size(2));
for(size_t ii = 0; ii < B.size(1); ii++)
{
for(size_t jj = 0; jj < B.size(2); jj++)
{
C(ii,jj) = a + B(ii,jj);
}
}
return C;
}
template<class V, class U>
matrix<decltype(std::declval<V>() + std::declval<U>())> operator+(const matrix<U> &A, const V &b)
{
matrix<decltype(std::declval<V>() + std::declval<U>())> C(A.size(1),A.size(2));
for(size_t ii = 0; ii < A.size(1); ii++)
{
for(size_t jj = 0; jj < A.size(2); jj++)
{
C(ii,jj) = A(ii,jj) + b;
}
}
return C;
}
int main()
{
matrix<double> A(3,3);
A(0,0) = 1.5;
matrix<int> B(3,3);
B(0,0) = 1;
auto C = A + B;
std::cout << C(0,0) << std::endl;
}
Question: Why am I getting this warning/error (depending on compiler flags)? How do I fix this without changing the desired interface?
It seems that the member function
is redundant with the function
Delete one of them.