I'm using the latest branch for Jackson module - jackson-module-jsonSchema i.e. 2.4.4-Snapshot.
I'm trying to use the @JsonPropertyOrder annotation to maintain the order of the POJO attributes, but it seems to be not respecting the annotation.
My sample POJO is as follows -
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonPropertyOrder;
@JsonPropertyOrder({"a", "b"})
class Pojo {
private String a;
private String b;
public Pojo(final String a, final String b) {
this.a = a;
this.b = b;
}
public void setA(final String a) {
this.a = a;
}
public void setB(final String b) {
this.b = b;
}
public String getA() {
return this.a;
}
public String getB() {
return this.b;
}
}
Jackson code is as follows -
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonProcessingException;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.module.jsonSchema.JsonSchema;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.module.jsonSchema.factories.SchemaFactoryWrapper;
public class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) throws JsonProcessingException {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
final ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
final SchemaFactoryWrapper visitor = new SchemaFactoryWrapper();
mapper.acceptJsonFormatVisitor(mapper.constructType(Pojo.class), visitor);
final JsonSchema jsonSchema = visitor.finalSchema();
System.out.println(mapper.writeValueAsString(jsonSchema));
}
}
Json Output is as follows -
{
"type": "object",
"id": "urn:jsonschema:Pojo",
"properties": {
"b": {
"type": "string"
},
"a": {
"type": "string"
}
}
}
Can somebody suggest if I'm doing something wrong or do we need to open an issue over jackson, since I see that this kind of issue is been already closed in 2.3.2 (https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-dataformat-xml/issues/91)?
Use @JsonPropertyOrder(alphabetic=true) This will order all the properties in alphabetical order Works with Jackson 1.9.13