Open Interconnect Consortium has just released IoTivity, an open source framework for IoT, similar to AllSeen Alliance's AllJoyn framework. What are the differences between them, apart from IoTivity being based on CoAP and AllJoyn based on D-Bus? Are they interoperable?
IoTivity vs AllJoyn - what is the difference?
12k views Asked by niutech At
6
There are 6 answers
0
On
When it comes to supported transports, AllJoyn now supports more. It supports IP-related physical layers like WiFi, WiFi-Direct, Ethernet and Powerline. Also, it can support bluetooth with their gateway agent. Other radios such as Bluetooth LE, 6LowPan, ZigBee or Z–Wave are encouraged to be added.
The following is a snapshot from the QA session in Allseen official website.
0
On
As explained at OpenIoT 2016 :
Full presentation at :
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/OpenIoT%20Summit%20Greg%20Burns.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siT2TPnTRHY&list=PLq2bxbH0KVGmtGRUQ4G7RfxsDeGtc9Yxz
This is a community wiki, so please expand it if you can.
Architecture
IoTivity
IoTivity provides 4 basic components:
AllJoyn
AllJoyn provides the following components:
It also provides the Thin variant without the Router.
Protocols
IoTivity
IoTivity will be using multiple protocols, but for now it uses CoAP. IT also has a MQTT plugin.
AllJoyn
AllJoyn provides its own bus based on D-Bus Wire protocol. AllJoyn Gateway Agent will have connectors for REST, MQTT, XMPP and TR-069.
Supported platforms
IoTivity
IoTivity currently supports:
AllJoyn
AllJoyn currently supports: