I know it is possible to do something like this:
Controller foo with action bar can be accessed by (1):
/appname/foo/bar
And it can be rewritten using URL mappings - e.g like this:
"/foobar/foo/$action"(controller: "foo")
And then access it via (2):
/appname/foobar/foo/bar
But it is still possible to access it via (1). This is of course because of the default URL mapping:
"/$controller/$action?/$id?"()
But I would rather not delete this, because this basically means I have to manually write mappings to every other controller/action that follows the default pattern.
It is possible to obtain url-patterns for specific controller/actions like (2) without using URL mappings? If not, is there an easy way to "exclude" controllers from the default mapping closure?
If you can make your rule breaking scenario more specific than the Grails default $controller/$action?$id? pattern, then the default can be left as is and will apply to everything outside of your exception pattern. I made a quick Person domain and performed a generate-all. Then I made a BreakRuleController just by itself.
With this UrlMapping, if you access the URI "/b/foo/stackoverflow" it will print "Breaking Rules foo: stackoverflow". If you go to "/b", it will print "Breaking Rules index".
Then if you go to the standard Person URI's, all your default Grails scaffolding works fine also (create, edit, etc.) because that gets mapped to the typical "$controller/$action?/$id?" pattern.