I delete and re-submit a job with the same name, and I often get a 409 HTTP error with a message that says that the object is being deleted -- my submit comes before the job object is removed.
My current solution is to spin-try until I am able to submit a job. I don't like it. This looks quite ugly and I wonder if there's a way to call deletion routine in a way that waits till the object is completely deleted. According to this kubectl waits till the object is actually deleted before returning from delete command. I wonder if there's an option for the Python client.
Here's my spin-submit code (not runnable, sorry):
# Set up client
config.load_kube_config(context=context)
configuration = client.Configuration()
api_client = client.ApiClient(configuration)
batch_api = client.BatchV1Api(api_client)
job = create_job_definition(...)
batch_api.delete_namespaced_job(job.metadata.name, "my-namespace")
for _ in range(50):
try:
return batch_api.create_namespaced_job(self.namespace, job)
except kubernetes.client.rest.ApiException as e:
body = json.loads(e.body)
job_is_being_deleted = body["message"].startswith("object is being deleted")
if not job_is_being_deleted:
raise
time.sleep(0.05)
I wish it was
batch_api.delete_namespaced_job(job.metadata.name, "my-namespace", wait=True)
batch_api.create_namespaced_job(self.namespace, job)
I have found a similar question, and the answer suggests to use watch, which means I need to start a watch in a separate thread, issue delete command, join the thread that waits till the deletion is confirmed by the watch -- seems like a lot of code for such a thing.
As you have already mentioned, kubectl delete has the
--wait
flag that does this exact job and istrue
by default.Let's have a look at the code and see how kubectl implements this. Source.
Additionally here are RunWait() and IsDeleted() function definitions.
Now answering your question:
It does look like so - it's a lot of code, but I don't see any alternative. If you want to wait for deletion to finish you need to do it manually. There does not seems to be any other way around it.