I have a yaml file similar to the following:
ComplexItemList:
- Name: First Complex item
Date: Whenever
StructItemList:
- Name: blah
Data1: 0
Data2: Silly
- Name: Yaddah
Data1: 12
Data2: Blah-blah-blah
- Name: Second Complex item
Date: Yesterday
StructItemList:
- Name: blah
Data1: 0
Data2: Silly
- Name: Yaddah
Data1: 12
Data2: Blah-blah-blah
Here is a simple version of my code:
package main
import (
"fmt"
"github.com/spf13/viper"
)
type StructItem struct {
Name string `yaml:"Name"`
Data1 int `yaml:"Data1"`
Data2 string `yaml:"Data2"`
}
type ComplexItem struct {
Name string `yaml:"Name"`
Date string `yaml:"Date"`
StructItemList []StructItem `yaml:"StructItemList,mapstructure"`
}
type TestConfig struct {
Version string `yaml:"Version"`
ComplexItemList []ComplexItem `yaml:"ComplexItemList,mapstructure"`
}
func main() {
viper.SetConfigName("simple1") // name of config file (without extension)
viper.SetConfigType("yaml") // REQUIRED if the config file does not have the extension in the name
viper.AddConfigPath(".")
err := viper.ReadInConfig() // Find and read the config file
if err != nil { // Handle errors reading the config file
panic(fmt.Errorf("Fatal error config file: %s \n", err))
}
test1 := viper.Get("ComplexItemList")
fmt.Printf("test1:\n%#v\n", test1)
// while I can easily unmarshal the information into a complex struct,
// updating the file contents via viper does not seem straight forward.
// Is there a way to access a specific item in an array using viper dot notation?
config := TestConfig{}
viper.Unmarshal(&config)
// is the best way to update Data1 for "First Complex item", just to update the
// unmarshalled struct then write the whole thing back out?
}
I want to use Viper to read the configuration file, but I'm unsure how to distinguish between "First Complex item" and "Second Complex item" when using the Get methods. Do I need to maintain state of the start of a complex item as they arrive?
I was over-complicating things. The easiest way is to unmarshal the values, update them, then Set the Array from the object.
Or is that not the correct way to handle updating the array in the yaml file via viper?