I'm having some trouble with comment blocks in my grammar. The syntax is fine, but Step 3 DFA scanner is complaining about the way I'm going about it.
The language I'm trying to parse looks like this:
{statement}{statement} etc.
Within each statement can be a couple of different types of comments:
{% This is a comment.
It can contain multiple lines
and continues until the statement end}
{statement REM This is a comment.
It can contain multiple lines
and continues until the statement end}
This is a simplified grammar that displays the problem I'm running into:
"Start Symbol" = <Program>
{String Chars} = {Printable} + {HT} - ["\]
StringLiteral = '"' ( {String Chars} | '\' {Printable} )* '"'
Comment Start = '{%'
Comment End = '}'
Comment Block @= { Ending = Closed } ! Eat the } and produce an empty statement
!Comment @= { Type = Noise } !Implied by GOLD
Remark Start = 'REM'
Remark End = '}'
Remark Block @= { Ending = Open } ! Don't eat the }, the statements expects it
Remark @= { Type = Noise }
<Program> ::= <Statements>
<Statements> ::= '{' <Statement> '}' <Statements> | <>
<Statement> ::= StringLiteral
Step 3 is complaining about the } in <Statements> and the } for the End of the lexical group.
Anyone know how to accomplish what I need?
[Edit]
I got the REM portion working with the following:
{Remark Chars} = {Printable} + {WhiteSpace} - [}]
Remark = 'REM' {Remark Chars}* '}'
<Statements> ::= <Statements> '{' <Statement> '}'
| <Statements> '{' <Statement> <Remark Stmt>
| <>
<Remark Stmt> ::= Remark
This is actually ideal, since Remarks are not necessarily noise to me.
Still having issues with the comment lexical group. I'll look at solving in the same way.
I don't think capturing the REM comment with a lexical group is possible.
I think you need to define a new terminal like this:
This however means, that you need to be able to handle this new terminal in your productions...
Eg. From:
To:
I have'nt checked the syntax in the above examples, but I hope you get my idear