What happens to members when you exclude two collections from one another in SCCM?
Scenario:
- Collection A contains Machine A and excludes Collection B from membership.
- Collection B contains nothing and excludes Collection A from membership.
- Machine A gets added to Collection B
Possible outcomes:
- Machine A receives no deployments from either collection
- Machine A receives only deployments assigned to Collection A because SCCM doesn't know how to handle this weird nested membership.
- Machine A receives deployments assigned to both Collection A and Collection B because it is in both despite the exclude.
- Machine A bounces between collections as each is evaluated because SCCM doesn't explicitly handle this case, and one collection's membership is evaluated on a different schedule than the other.
Has anyone attempted this before? My goal would be for no deployments to be evaluated if an object has been added to both collections.
You're correct; you shouldn't get any deployments with that setup.