I'm using Visual c++.
I'm trying to implement a circular buffer, this CB must handle a specific type of data...in fact, it's a structure data where we have some kind of raw data to be stored in a char type and a date associated to that data...this has been implemented using a strucuture.
here is the code for more details:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <windows.h>
//data=date_label+raw_data
typedef struct DataFragment
{
char data[4];
clock_t date;
}DataFragment;
typedef struct CircularBuffer
{
DataFragment *buffer; // data buffer
DataFragment *buffer_end; // end of data buffer
size_t capacity; // maximum number of items in the buffer
size_t count; // number of items in the buffer
size_t sz; // size of each item in the buffer
DataFragment *head; // pointer to head
DataFragment *tail; // pointer to tail
} CircularBuffer;
void cb_init(struct CircularBuffer *cb, size_t capacity, size_t sz)
{
if((cb->buffer = (DataFragment*) malloc(capacity * sz))!=NULL)
puts("success alocation");
//if(cb->buffer == NULL)
//handle error
cb->buffer_end = (DataFragment *)cb->buffer + (capacity-1)*sz;
cb->capacity = capacity;
cb->count = 0;
cb->sz = sz;
cb->head = cb->buffer;
cb->tail = cb->buffer;
}
void cb_free(struct CircularBuffer *cb)
{
free(cb->buffer);
// clear out other fields too, just to be safe
}
void cb_push_back(struct CircularBuffer *cb, const DataFragment *item)
{
//if(cb->count == cb->capacity)
//handle error when it's full
memcpy(cb->head->data, item->data,4);
cb->head->date=item->date;
cb->head = (DataFragment*)cb->head + cb->sz;
if(cb->head == cb->buffer_end)
cb->head = cb->buffer;
cb->count++;
}
void cb_pop_front(struct CircularBuffer *cb, DataFragment *item)
{
//if(cb->count == 0)
//handle error
memcpy(item->data, cb->tail->data,4);
item->date=cb->tail->date;
cb->tail = (DataFragment*)cb->tail + cb->sz;
if(cb->tail == cb->buffer_end)
cb->tail = cb->buffer;
cb->count--;
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
struct CircularBuffer pbuf;
pbuf.buffer=NULL;
pbuf.buffer_end=NULL;
pbuf.capacity=0;
pbuf.count=0;
pbuf.head=NULL;
pbuf.sz=0;
pbuf.tail=NULL;
struct CircularBuffer *buf= &pbuf;
size_t sizz = sizeof(DataFragment);
//initialisation of the circlar buffer to a total bytes
//of capacity*sizz=100*sizeof(struct DataFragment)
cb_init(buf,100,sizz);
//temporary container of data
DataFragment temp,temp2;
for(int i=0;i<4;i++)
temp.data[i]='k';
for(int i=0;i<4;i++)
temp2.data[i]='o';
//pushing temporary buffer to the CB...40*2=80<capacity of the CB
for(int i=0;i<40;i++)
{
Sleep(20);
temp.date=clock();
cb_push_back(buf,&temp);
Sleep(10);
temp2.date=clock();
cb_push_back(buf,&temp2);
}
DataFragment temp3;
for(int i=0;i<20;i++)
{
cb_pop_front(buf,&temp3);
printf("%d\n", temp3.data); //print integers....no need of end caracter
}
cb_free(buf);
return 0;
}
When I compile the code, everything is fine, but when I debug, I noticed a problem with the buffer_end pointer, it says bad_pointer....this happens if the capacity is greater than 56...I don't know why the pointer can't point to end of the buffer.But if the capacity is less than 56 the pointer points exactly on the end of the buffer
If anyone knows why this happens like this, and how to fix it, please help me..
thanks in advance
It seems you are misunderstanding pointer arithmetic
Pointer arithmetic already takes into account the size of the underlying type. All you really need is
If the idea is to hack around
sizeof(DataFragment)
- perhaps to allocate more storage for one item than the struct's size - for some evil purpose - you'll need to first cast the pointer to achar*
(becausesizeof(char) == 1
).Design-wise the struct appears to have too many members:
buffer_end
andcapacity
duplicate each other (given one you can always find the other), and thesz
member is not necessary (it should always besizeof(DataFragment)
.Also, I believe you can just assign structs
there seem to be completely unnecessary casts (probably resulting from the misunderstanding of pointer arithmetic):
And if it is supposed to be C++, then it contains lots of "C-isms" (typedeffing structs, using
struct XXX var;
- despite having it typedeffed, etc), and the code is generally designed in a purely C style (not taking advantage of C++'s greatest strength, automatic resource management with RAII).May I also point out that
clock()
hardly gives you a date :)