Can I treat consecutive data members of the same type as a range? For example:
struct X
{
int a, b, c, d, e;
};
X x = {42, 13, 97, 11, 31};
std::sort(&x.a, &x.a + 5); // kosher?
Can I treat consecutive data members of the same type as a range? For example:
struct X
{
int a, b, c, d, e;
};
X x = {42, 13, 97, 11, 31};
std::sort(&x.a, &x.a + 5); // kosher?
If this is really something you want to do, make it an array, vector or similar.
As others have said, the standard makes no guarantees about the members being stored without gaps or otherwise things that cause problems. (And to make matters worse, it will appear to work, until you compile it with a different (version of) compiler, or for another architecture some months or years later, and of course, it won't be easy to figure out what went wrong).
Generally, it's a bad idea. If you want to treat some variables as array, you should declare them as array :)
Nevertheless you can use some compiler-specific instruction to ensure that there is no padding between elements, f.i.:
#pragma pack(push, 1)
struct X
{
int a, b, c, d, e;
};
#pragma pack(pop)
or
struct __attribute__((__packed__)) X
{
int a, b, c, d, e;
};
No, this is undefined behaviour. You are treating
x.a
like the first element of an array, which it isn't. May work on some implementations, may raid your fridge too ;)