First let me say that yes, this is a horrible way to have stored data, second, it isn't my fault :) I am trying to integrate with a 3rd party database to extract info which is stored in 3 tables, which really should have been in two AND stored where table 2 had a many to one relationship. Since that isn't the case, I have a puzzle to share.
Table one contains rows in which multiple values can be stored. Each row has codeid1
-codeid20
. These columns may contain a value, or a 0 (they are never null
). They also have a corresponding codetype1
-codetype20
which will be either 0 or 1.
If codetype1
is equal to 0, we go to table 2 and select description
from the matching table1.codeid1=table2.id
. If codetype1
equals 1, we now have to look at table3 and find where table1.codeid1=table3.id
and then match table3.table2id=table2.id
and return the description.
Here is the data structure:
table1
codeid1,codeid2,codeid3,...codeid20 ... codetype1,codetype2,codetype3,.....codetype20
18 13 1 33 0 0 1 1
13 21 45 0 0 1 0 0
table2
id, description
13 Item 13 Description
15 Item 15 Description
17 Item 17 Description
18 Item 18 Description
21 Item 21 Description
28 Item 28 Description
45 Item 45 Description
table3
id, table2id
1 15
33 17
21 28
The results I would be looking for would look like this:
rowid, description
1 Item 18 Description
1 Item 13 Description
1 Item 15 Description
1 Item 17 Description
2 Item 13 Description
2 Item 28 Description
2 Item 45 Description
I got started working with someone last night, but I had missed part of the complexity of my situation in not integrating table3. Like I said, fun puzzle... This gives me the relationship between the first 2 tables, but I am unsure how I can work in a 3rd table.
SELECT table1.rowid, table2.description
FROM table2
INNER JOIN table1
ON table2.id=table1.codeie1
OR table2.id=table1.codeie2
...
The database is a Faircom C-Tree DB over an ODBC connection, which is generally compatible with Mysql statements including UNION, WITH, INTERSECT, EXISTS, JOIN... There is no PIVOT function.
Perhaps it will work with
or
rather thanin
: