I am taking my first steps with RX. I have read some bits about it but I thought getting my hands dirty would be the better way to go. So I started transforming one my existing codes into a Rx type of code.
The goal: I am trying to mock a source that sends out data with a specific frequency (say 60/s, a video camera or whatever). I have footage that was recorded to simulate the source while the source is not available. And I need the source to start sending even if no one is listening because thats what the real source would do.
Before Rx, I went and made a Runnable that just iterates over the 15.000 data items, sends the item to my RabbitMQ server and sleeps for 1/60s and then sends the next one.
Now I want to turn that logic into a hot observable, just for playing around. So far I have this:
Observable.from(mDataItems)
.takeWhile(item -> mRunning)
.map(mGson::toJson)
.doOnNext(json -> {
try {
mChannel.basicPublish(EXCHANGE_NAME, "", null, json.getBytes());
} catch (IOException e) {
Logger.error(e, String.format("Could not publish to %s exchange", EXCHANGE_NAME));
}
try {
Thread.sleep(1 / SENDING_FREQUENCY_IN_HZ);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
Logger.error(e, String.format("Could not sleep for %d ms", (int) (1000 / SENDING_FREQUENCY_IN_HZ)));
}
})
.doOnCompleted(() -> {
if (mRunning)
Logger.info("All data sent");
else
Logger.info("Interrupted while sending");
disconnect();
mRunning = false;
})
.subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
.publish()
.connect();
And even though it works so far, I dont know if this is the "good" way to create a hot Observable (or a Observable in general for that matter) that just emits items. (I also dont know if I should use a Subject instead of a Observable, but thats another question).
Yes, there is an alternative: