Chomsky Normal Form conversion

514 views Asked by At

I need your help as soon as possible. I should do the conversion to Chomsky Normal Form.

S -> 01S | XY

X -> 110Y | 0 | ε

Y -> YY | 1

I had few attempts, but I always get stuck because I've got these mixed parts e.g. 110Y...

2

There are 2 answers

0
Pavani Lake On

ALGORITHM TO CONVERT CHOMSKY NORMAL FORM::

Step 1 − If the start symbol S occurs on some right side, create a new start symbol S’ and a new production S’→ S.

Step 2 − Remove Null productions. (Using the Null production removal algorithm discussed earlier)

Step 3 − Remove unit productions. (Using the Unit production removal algorithm discussed earlier)

Step 4 − Replace each production A → B1…Bn where n > 2 with A → B1C where C → B2 …Bn. Repeat this step for all productions having two or more symbols in the right side.

Step 5 − If the right side of any production is in the form A → aB where a is a terminal and A, B are non-terminal, then the production is replaced by A → XB and X → a. Repeat this step for every production which is in the form A → aB.

Problem:

Convert the following CFG into CNF

S → ASA | aB, A → B | S, B → b | ε

Solution (1) Since S appears in R.H.S, we add a new state S0 and S0→S is added to the production set and it becomes −

S0→S, S→ ASA | aB, A → B | S, B → b | ∈

(2) Now we will remove the null productions −

B → ∈ and A → ∈

After removing B → ε, the production set becomes −

S0→S, S→ ASA | aB | a, A → B | S | ∈, B → b

After removing A → ∈, the production set becomes −

S0→S, S→ ASA | aB | a | AS | SA | S, A → B | S, B → b

(3) Now we will remove the unit productions.

After removing S → S, the production set becomes −

S0→S, S→ ASA | aB | a | AS | SA, A → B | S, B → b

After removing S0→ S, the production set becomes −

S0→ ASA | aB | a | AS | SA, S→ ASA | aB | a | AS | SA

A → B | S, B → b

After removing A→ B, the production set becomes −

S0 → ASA | aB | a | AS | SA, S→ ASA | aB | a | AS | SA

A → S | b

B → b

After removing A→ S, the production set becomes −

S0 → ASA | aB | a | AS | SA, S→ ASA | aB | a | AS | SA

A → b |ASA | aB | a | AS | SA, B → b

(4) Now we will find out more than two variables in the R.H.S

Here, S0→ ASA, S → ASA, A→ ASA violates two Non-terminals in R.H.S.

Hence we will apply step 4 and step 5 to get the following final production set which is in CNF −

S0→ AX | aB | a | AS | SA

S→ AX | aB | a | AS | SA

A → b |AX | aB | a | AS | SA

B → b

X → SA

(5) We have to change the productions S0→ aB, S→ aB, A→ aB

And the final production set becomes −

S0→ AX | YB | a | AS | SA

S→ AX | YB | a | AS | SA

A → b A → b |AX | YB | a | AS | SA

B → b

X → SA

Y → a

0
Nikolay Handzhiyski On

A little late, but still as soon as possible:

Starting grammar:

S → 01S | XY
X → 110Y | 0 | ε
Y → YY | 1

Split the concatenations into separate productions:

S → 01S
S → XY
X → 110Y
X → 0
X → ε
Y → YY
Y → 1

Remove the epsilon (inline X):

S → 01S
S → 110YY
S → 0Y
S → Y
Y → YY
Y → 1

Remove production S → Y:

S → 01S
S → 110YY
S → 0Y
S → YY
S → 1
Y → YY
Y → 1

Replace all terminal symbols with a new production that has the symbol in the right-hand side:

S → ABS
S → BBAYY
S → AY
S → YY
S → 1
Y → YY
Y → 1
A → 0
B → 1

Break all productions that have more then two non-terminal symbols in the right-hand side:

S → CS
S → DE
S → AY
S → YY
S → 1
Y → YY
Y → 1
A → 0
B → 1
C → AB
D → BB
E → AF
F → YY

Then you are done.