Summarizing the C standard, specifically ISO/IEC 9899:201x §6.3.2.3 - 3:
If a pointer is being compared to the constant literal 0
, then this is a check to see if the pointer is a null pointer. This 0
is then referred to as a null pointer constant. The C standard defines that 0
cast to the type void *
is both a null pointer and a null pointer constant.
Now if we look at (void *)0
it is an address(illegal in this context) that is pointing to void
.
Normally we can cast such an address to any appropriate pointer datatype and dereference it but here even after casting it to some other pointer type it is illegal to dereference it.
So my doubt is:
Can we call (void *)0
as a void pointer looking the way it is defined?
Also see the below code:
void *pointer = NULL;
What will I call it now? A void pointer, a null pointer or a null void pointer?
In this declaration
there is declared a pointer of the type
void *
that is anull pointer
due to initializing it with a null pointer constant.A pointer to object of any type can be a null pointer.
The casting of the zero integer constant to
void *
is used because a pointer of the typevoid *
can be implicitly converted to any other object pointer type. Another advantage of using the typevoid *
is that you may not dereference a pointer of that type because the typevoid
is always an incomplete type.Early versions of C did not have the type
void
. Instead of the typevoid
there was used the typechar
. So for example in old C programs you can encounter something like the following