Help me please with gnu assembler for arm926ejs cpu.
I try to build a simple program(test.S):
.global _start
_start:
mov r0, #2
bx lr
and success build it:
arm-none-linux-gnueabi-as -mthumb -o test.o test.S
arm-none-linux-gnueabi-ld -o test test.o
but when I run the program in the arm target linux environment, I get an error:
./test
Segmentation fault
What am I doing wrong? Can _start function be the thumb func? or It is always arm func?
On
Can _start be a thumb function (in a Linux user program)?
Yes it can. The steps are not as simple as you may believe.
Please use the .code 16 as described by others. Also look at ARM Script predicate; my answer shows how to detect a thumb binary. The entry symbol must have the traditional _start+1 value or Linux will decide to call your _start in ARM mode.
Also your code is trying to emulate,
int main(void) { return 2; }
The _start symbol must not do this (as per auselen). To do _start to main() in ARM mode you need,
#include <linux/unistd.h>
static inline void exit(int status)
{
asm volatile ("mov r0, %0\n\t"
"mov r7, %1\n\t"
"swi #7\n\t"
: : "r" (status),
"Ir" (__NR_exit)
: "r0", "r7");
}
/* Wrapper for main return code. */
void __attribute__ ((unused)) estart (int argc, char*argv[])
{
int rval = main(argc,argv);
exit(rval);
}
/* Setup arguments for estart [like main()]. */
void __attribute__ ((naked)) _start (void)
{
asm(" sub lr, lr, lr\n" /* Clear the link register. */
" ldr r0, [sp]\n" /* Get argc... */
" add r1, sp, #4\n" /* ... and argv ... */
" b estart\n" /* Let's go! */
);
}
It is good to clear the lr so that stack traces will terminate. You can avoid the argc and argv processing if you want. The start shows how to work with this. The estart is just a wrapper to convert the main() return code to an exit() call.
You need to convert the above assembler to Thumb equivalents. I would suggest using gcc inline assembler. You can convert to pure assembler source if you get inlines to work. However, doing this in 'C' source is probably more practical, unless you are trying to make a very minimal executable.
Helpful gcc arguements are,
-nostartfiles -static -nostdlib -isystem <path to linux user headers>
Add -mthumb and you should have a harness for either mode.
On
here answer.
Thanks for all.
http://stuff.mit.edu/afs/sipb/project/egcs/src/egcs/gcc/config/arm/README-interworking
Calls via function pointers should use the
BXinstruction if the call is made in ARM mode:.code 32 mov lr, pc bx rXThis code sequence will not work in Thumb mode however, since the mov instruction will not set the bottom bit of the
lrregister. Instead a branch-and-link to the_call_via_rXfunctions should be used instead:.code 16 bl _call_via_rXwhere
rXis replaced by the name of the register containing the function address.
Your problem is you end with
and you expect Linux to take over after that. That exact line must be the cause of
Segmentation fault.You can try to create a minimal executable then try to bisect it to see the guts and understand how an executable is expected to behave.
See below for a working example:
compile with
and dump to see the guts
Now you should notice the odd address of
_start