I can get all elements in a single bucket with this code:
typedef boost::unordered_multimap< key, myClass*, MyHash<key> >
HashMMap;
HashMMap::iterator it;
it = hashMMap_.find( someKey);
int bucketIndex = hashMMap_.bucket( someKey);
int bucketSize = hashMMap_.bucket_size( bucketIndex);
qDebug() << "index of bucket with key:" << someKey << " is:"
<< bucketIndex;
qDebug() << "number of elements in bucket with index:" << bucketIndex << " is:"
<< bucketSize;
HashMMap::local_iterator lit;
/* begin of bucket with index bucketIndex */
lit = hashMMap_.begin( bucketIndex);
for ( ; lit != sender_.hashMMap_.end( bucketIndex); ++lit) {
qDebug() << "(*lit).first:" << (*lit).first << ", (*lit).second:" <<
(*lit).second << ", (*lit).second->something_:" <<
(*lit).second->something_;
}
I would like to get a local_iterator to the first element in a bucket and iterate over it till the bucket end, so if there is only one value for a given index in hash table (where index is the Hash(key)
) I will iterate just through a single element and receive bucket end(), and in case of many elements I will iterate whole bucket (all values with equal hash). is this possible without bucketIndex
, hashMMap_.begin( bucketIndex)
and hashMMap_.end( bucketIndex)
?
so basically I would like to get a local_iterator like this:
HashMMap::local_iterator lit = hashMMap_.find_bucket_if_present( someKey);
Additional question is: do I have to test first if find()
returns an iterator to element before calling int bucketIndex = hashMMap_.bucket( someKey)
? This is what I think because explanation of bucket()
function from boost site is:
Returns: The index of the bucket which would contain an element with key k.
^^^
I think this means I have first to find(key)
in the multimap to know if key is present, because a call to bucket(key)
will return an index which is not a hash but modulo of hash (bucket_from_hash
) in the hash table under which key is stored if it is present. So because of the modulo which is done with bucket_count
, if key was not inserted I will iterate over a virtual bucket in which it would be under current circumstances, and what is most important for me: also different hashes could be there as the bucket_count might be less than my hash (I use 16-bit MyHash<key>
of 32-bit key as a hash function provided into multimap constructor). Is this correct?
I would start working with ranges, like so:
then, at least in C++11, you can do the following:
and it iterates over everything in the
"bob"
bucket.While this does use
bucketIndex
, it hides these details from the end consumer, and simply gives you aboost::range
instead.