Agda Store Comonad

189 views Asked by At

I'm just starting with Agda but know some Haskell and would like to know how to define the Store Comonad in Agda.

This is what I have until now:

   open import Category.Comonad
   open import Data.Product

   Store : Set → Set → ((Set → Set) × Set)
   Store s a = ((λ s → a) , s)

   StoreComonad : RawComonad (λ s a → (Store s a))
   StoreComonad = record
     { extract (Store s a) = extract s a
     ; extend f (Store s a = Store (extend (λ s' a' →­ f (Store s' a')) s) a
     } where open RawComonad

For now I'm getting the following error:

Parse error
=<ERROR>
 extract s a
  ; extend f (Sto...

I'm not too sure what it is I'm doing wrong. Any help would be appreciated! Thanks!

EDIT

I think I'm getting closer. I replaced the fields in the record using matching lambdas:

Store : Set → Set → ((Set → Set) × Set)
Store s a = ((λ s → a) , s)

StoreComonad : RawComonad (λ s a → (Store s a))
StoreComonad = record
  { extract   = λ st → (proj₁ st) (proj₂ st)
  ; duplicate = λ st → Store (λ s → Store (proj₁ st) s) (proj₂ st)
  ; extend    = λ g st → g (duplicate st)
  } where open RawComonad

RawComonad is from https://github.com/agda/agda-stdlib/blob/master/src/Category/Comonad.agda and has the signature

record RawComonad (W : Set f → Set f) : Set (suc f)

and Store is based on type Store s a = (s -> a, s) in Haskell.

Now the error I'm getting is:

(a : Set) → Σ (Set → Set) (λ x → Set) !=< Set
when checking that the expression λ a → Store s a has type Set

I'm wondering if this error has to do with this line:

StoreComonad : RawComonad (λ s a → (Store s a))

I find that the compilation error messages in Agda don't give many clues or I haven't yet been able to understand them well.

2

There are 2 answers

0
Cactus On BEST ANSWER

Your problem is that λ s a → (Store s a) (or, eta-contracted, Store) is not a comonad; its type (or, for your Haskell intuition, we could say its kind) is not right.

However, for any choice of s, Store s is! So let's write that:

StoreComonad : ∀ {s : Set} → RawComonad (Store s)

The rest of the definition of StoreComonad will follow easily.

As an aside, you can make the definition of StoreComonad nicer by using pattern-matching lambdas instead of using explicit projections (and please do read that link because it seems you have mixed up normal lambdas with pattern-matching ones); e.g:

  extract   = λ { (f , a) → f a }

and so on.

0
fsuna064 On

Wow, ok, I think silence was the answer I needed. I managed to advance quite a bit on defining the Store Comonad:

S : Set
S = ℕ

Store : Set → Set
Store A = ((S → A) × S)

pos : ∀ {A : Set} → Store A → S
pos = λ st → proj₂ st

peek : ∀ {A : Set} → S → Store A → A
peek = λ s → λ st → (proj₁ st) s

fmap : ∀ {A : Set} {B : Set} → (A → B) → Store A → Store B
fmap = λ f → λ st → ((f ∘ proj₁ st) , proj₂ st)

duplicate' : ∀ {A : Set} → (Store A) → Store (Store A)
duplicate' = λ st → (λ s' → proj₁ st , s') , proj₂ st

StoreComonad : RawComonad Store
StoreComonad = record
  { extract = λ st → (proj₁ st) (proj₂ st)
  ; extend  = λ g st → fmap g (duplicate' st)
  } where open RawComonad

along the way I learned that C-c-C-l and C-c-C-r with ? can be quite helpful in trying to find the type that is needed to fill the ?. I used ? for proving some examples before but hadn't tried using it to find how to write a type.

What's left.. I would like to make S not just a Nat.