Accelerate's vImage vs. vDSP

Question

I'm trying to use the Accelerate framework on iOS to bypass the fact that Core Image on iOS doesn't support custom filters/kernels. I'm developing an edge detection filter using two convolutions with a Sobel kernel, but starting with a simple Gaussian blur to get the hangs of it. I know vImage is geared towards image manipulation as matrices and vDSP focuses in processing digital signals using Fourier transforms. But although I started using the vImage functions (vImageConvolve_XXXX, etc), I'm hearing a lot of people discussing the use of vDSP's functions (vDSP_conv, vDSP_imgfir, etc) to do such things as convolutions. So that leads me to the question at hand: when should I use one over the other? What are the differences between them with regards to convolution operations? I've looked everywhere but couldn't find a clear answer. Can someone shed some lights on it, or point me in the right direction?

Thanks!

Answer 1

If vImage provides the operation you need, it is usually simplest to use that. vImage does cache blocking and threading for you, vDSP does not. vImage provides operations on interleaved and integer formats, which are often useful for image processing.

Answer 2

Last time I experimented, neither of these frameworks took advantage of kernel separability, which affords a huge performance boost when convolving in the spatial domain -- a far larger performance boost than vectorized instructions will ever buy you. The Sobel kernel in particular is separable, so if you're using vDSP or vImage (instead of say OpenCV), be sure to separate the kernel yourself.