TechQA.

"There is no need to deallocate the stack at the end of the function when the inner-stack frame isn't modified", but it is being modified in this case

score 105 · Answer 6 · 2022-11-09 21:05:06

0

Answer

105

Views

mov rbp-XX vs push/pop semantics - is it "proper" stack use?

105 views Asked by the_endian At 09 November 2022 at 21:05

score 299 · Answer 7 · 2022-11-19 14:35:38

the stack pointer doesn't point to the top of the stack

299 views Asked by Mehdi Charife At 19 November 2022 at 14:35

score 910 · Answer 8 · 2018-07-25 15:52:43

Why does the compiler reserve a little stack space but not the whole array size?

910 views Asked by Riolku At 25 July 2018 at 15:52

score 345 · Answer 9 · 2020-04-08 11:37:59

Different ways how gcc allocate memory for stack

345 views Asked by miran80 At 08 April 2020 at 11:37

score 1898 · Answer 10 · 2011-12-01 07:18:50

Why does GCC subtract the wrong value to the stack pointer when allocating a big array with no subsequent function calls?

1.8k views Asked by AudioBubble At 01 December 2011 at 07:18

TechQA.

List Question

GCC access memory above stack top

Setting up local stack according to x86-64 calling convention on linux

Why stack pointer %rsp is not (always) grown before using it?

Why doesn't gcc assembly substract rsp?

"There is no need to deallocate the stack at the end of the function when the inner-stack frame isn't modified", but it is being modified in this case

mov rbp-XX vs push/pop semantics - is it "proper" stack use?

the stack pointer doesn't point to the top of the stack

Why does the compiler reserve a little stack space but not the whole array size?

Different ways how gcc allocate memory for stack

Why does GCC subtract the wrong value to the stack pointer when allocating a big array with no subsequent function calls?

Popular Questions

Popular Tags

Trending Questions