TechQA.

Question

How parameter type conversion in C++ operator works?

score 39 · Answer 1 · 2024-01-18T17:57:33.987000

0

Answer

39

Views

How parameter type conversion in C++ operator works?

39 views Asked by CPW At 18 January 2024 at 17:57

score 133 · Answer 2 · 2023-09-11T14:12:07.930000

Is there any reason to mark a constructor of an abstract class as explicit

133 views Asked by Caduchon At 11 September 2023 at 14:12

score 469 · Answer 3 · 2023-03-14T13:23:51.353000

error: use of deleted function operator=(&&) with std::optional

469 views Asked by glades At 14 March 2023 at 13:23

score 159 · Answer 4 · 2022-12-17T09:58:46.300000

Why is there no implicit conversion sequence from int to vector<double>?

159 views Asked by Starhowl At 17 December 2022 at 09:58

score 989 · Answer 5 · 2022-01-18T15:11:18.003000

C++ copy assignment operator behaviour

989 views Asked by ZR_xdhp At 18 January 2022 at 15:11

score 417 · Answer 6 · 2021-12-22T15:47:03.067000

Why is my explicit constructor creating this ambiguity for my conversion operator?

417 views Asked by Richard Fabian At 22 December 2021 at 15:47

score 237 · Answer 7 · 2021-10-17T12:31:28.520000

Why is the converting constructor preferred to the conversion operator?

237 views Asked by Itachi Uchiwa At 17 October 2021 at 12:31

score 256 · Answer 8 · 2021-01-26T10:12:10.997000

Can't add element into container<T> with emplace new if T has explicit constructor

256 views Asked by thamas At 26 January 2021 at 10:12

score 1341 · Answer 9 · 2020-12-22T09:30:03.770000

C++ use of explicit suggested by cppcheck

1.3k views Asked by DDS At 22 December 2020 at 09:30

score 1456 · Answer 10 · 2020-06-22T16:58:20.987000

Is there really no explicit constructor of std::string from an std::string_view?

1.4k views Asked by einpoklum At 22 June 2020 at 16:58

score 130 · Answer 11 · 2020-03-26T13:35:26.853000

To use parameterized constructor through explicit call

130 views Asked by AudioBubble At 26 March 2020 at 13:35

score 349 · Answer 12 · 2019-03-18T15:56:50.020000

Why is the constructor of std::in_place_t defaulted and explicit?

349 views Asked by Martin Fehrs At 18 March 2019 at 15:56

score 137 · Answer 13 · 2018-10-30T09:43:54.707000

C++: Particularities of considering but not calling constructors

137 views Asked by Reizo At 30 October 2018 at 09:43

score 134 · Answer 14 · 2018-09-23T19:53:30.240000

Avoid spelling out type in artificially amgibuous overloaded function call

134 views Asked by AudioBubble At 23 September 2018 at 19:53

score 280 · Answer 15 · 2018-06-10T18:21:26.933000

Copy constructor and overloaded addition operator

280 views Asked by Eduardo J. Sanchez At 10 June 2018 at 18:21

score 409 · Answer 16 · 2018-03-14T14:43:41.620000

Why is the constructor in this C++ code ambiguous and how do I fix it?

409 views Asked by AOK At 14 March 2018 at 14:43

score 544 · Answer 17 · 2018-02-24T11:49:03.780000

Explicit constructor still allows for implicit conversion

544 views Asked by Julian At 24 February 2018 at 11:49

score 1709 · Answer 18 · 2018-02-12T09:05:54.280000

Initializing array through explicit constructor

1.7k views Asked by bgp2000 At 12 February 2018 at 09:05

score 177 · Answer 19 · 2017-09-15T18:29:00.797000

c++ explicit constructor called in implicit situation

177 views Asked by eivour At 15 September 2017 at 18:29

score 2379 · Answer 20 · 2017-05-24T23:48:26.610000

Explicit default constructors in C++17

2.3k views Asked by Tristan Brindle At 24 May 2017 at 23:48

TechQA.

List Question

How parameter type conversion in C++ operator works?

Is there any reason to mark a constructor of an abstract class as explicit

error: use of deleted function operator=(&&) with std::optional

Why is there no implicit conversion sequence from int to vector<double>?

C++ copy assignment operator behaviour

Why is my explicit constructor creating this ambiguity for my conversion operator?

Why is the converting constructor preferred to the conversion operator?

Can't add element into container<T> with emplace new if T has explicit constructor

C++ use of explicit suggested by cppcheck

Is there really no explicit constructor of std::string from an std::string_view?

To use parameterized constructor through explicit call

Why is the constructor of std::in_place_t defaulted and explicit?

C++: Particularities of considering but not calling constructors

Avoid spelling out type in artificially amgibuous overloaded function call

Copy constructor and overloaded addition operator

Why is the constructor in this C++ code ambiguous and how do I fix it?

Explicit constructor still allows for implicit conversion

Initializing array through explicit constructor

c++ explicit constructor called in implicit situation

Explicit default constructors in C++17

Popular Questions

Trending Questions